In March 2016, a 12-year-old boy was placed at the Centre de réadaptation Héritage in Gatineau. Days later, a serious incident occurred in the showers. The DPJ knew. They concealed everything from the court for four years. Reports vanished. A social worker was pressured into silence. And a father spent a decade documenting what the system refused to acknowledge.
This account rests on two distinct sources: the public judgment rendered on April 16, 2021 by Judge Jean-François Noël of the Quebec Court's Youth Division (2021 QCCQ 2868, case 550-41-002220-166), and the reproduction of judicial proceedings from those hearings, obtained by Justice-Quebec.ca. When an element comes from the proceedings rather than the written judgment, we indicate this clearly. The names of minors have been changed in accordance with the Act respecting the protection of youth.
Three days after admission
M. M. is a landscaper in Gatineau. His son Sébastien — a fictitious first name — was 12 years old in March 2016 when he was placed with the Direction de la protection de la jeunesse (DPJ) of the Outaouais region. He was housed at the Centre de réadaptation Héritage, at 155 chemin Freeman in Gatineau. A few days after his admission, he found himself in the centre's showers with another resident — a teenager known to staff for sexually intrusive behaviour.
"He tells me he doesn't want people to think he's homosexual and that nothing happened in the showers, that [the other youth] is a good guy and he likes him. Suddenly, he falls to the floor, his eyes stare blankly and he breathes heavily. About 30 seconds later, he catches his breath, grabs my arm and asks me what just happened."
— Educator's report, reproduced in the Noël judgment · 2021 QCCQ 2868The Noël judgment establishes that police were not notified, that no medical examination was conducted, and that if a report was filed, no trace of it remains in the system. The father was told of the incident the next day — and was forbidden from seeing his son or discussing the matter with him. The alleged aggressor continued to live in the same facility. Sébastien made suicidal statements in the following days. The judge would conclude that he had been left to fend for himself.
Cosmetic measures followed — a lock on the shower door, armchairs replacing the sofas in the common room. Nothing was done to keep the two teenagers apart. And the incident was never reported to the court. For four years.
A physical restraint. Missing reports. A troubled judge.
The Noël judgment establishes that during his stay, Sébastien was involved in physical restraint incidents carried out by centre staff, including one that left significant marks on his body. A criminal investigation for assault was opened. A court order required the submission of all written notes. The archivist confirmed: no report existed in the system. A second verification yielded the same result.
"Either the report has indeed disappeared, or it exists and the Director chose not to produce it in the context of this investigation. In either case, the situation is at the very least troubling."
— Judge Jean-François Noël · 2021 QCCQ 2868Counsel argued before the judge that the unit supervisor had allegedly ordered the agents to leave the premises immediately after the restraint incident, without writing a report. During her testimony, this same supervisor initially claimed the report existed in the system — before walking back her statement, saying she would be "curious to see if it's still there."
A police officer subpoenaed. A social worker who refused to stay silent.
In the context of the rights violation proceedings, a police investigator was subpoenaed to testify before Judge Noël.
Counsel described before the judge that the investigator had found it difficult to testify against DPJ allies — to the point of requiring a subpoena. According to those same proceedings, she allegedly testified that notes had been modified or deleted at Centre Héritage, and acknowledged having written internal reports that were handed to the Crown prosecutor while the parallel criminal trial was suspended. She allegedly stated: "I have to protect the children. There are things that need to change at Héritage — especially the preservation of notes, to prevent their falsification, modification or deletion."
The social worker who joined Sébastien's file in January 2019 searched the system for the 2016 report. She did not find it. She testified against the institutional position of management.
According to the arguments presented, there were alleged attempts to replace her as a witness because she refused to align her testimony with management's directive. After taking the stand, no one congratulated her — except one colleague.
Judge Noël describes her testimony as solid and highly credible, and commends her exemplary dedication and courage.
— Noël judgment · 2021 QCCQ 2868Five rights violations. A formal reprimand. And promises.
After seven days of hearings held between December 2019 and February 2021, Judge Jean-François Noël delivered his judgment. Five distinct rights violations against Sébastien were recognized. A formal reprimand was issued to the Director of Youth Protection of the Outaouais. The judgment was forwarded to the Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse.
"The violations are serious and repetitive and deserve to be denounced vigorously, in the form of a reprimand addressed to the Director."
"The Director failed in her duty of transparency and deprived the court of important information, thereby infringing on the rights of the child and his parents to be treated with courtesy, fairness and understanding, in respect of their dignity and autonomy."
The Minister Delegate for Health and Social Services, Lionel Carmant, expressed outrage. The Vice-President of the Commission des droits de la personne, Suzanne Arpin, declared that the Commission would examine the situation. The CISSS de l'Outaouais promised action. A journalist was present during the hearings.
The DPJ of the Outaouais did not appeal the judgment. M. M. preserved over 1,000 pages of documents over the years — documents the DPJ had declared missing. His son Sébastien is now an adult.
What the institutions said
On elements related to the Noël judgment and the director remaining in her position: "Due to legal obligations regarding confidentiality and personal information protection, we are not in a position to comment on these elements."
On the identity of the youth involved: "It is not permitted to disclose the identity of a child involved, even after they reach adulthood. Such disclosure would contravene the provisions of the Act respecting the protection of youth."
The CDPDJ indicated that some individuals holding relevant information are no longer at the Commission — "as is the case for Suzanne Arpin." No substantive response had been received at the time of publication.
Suzanne Arpin was Vice-President of the CDPDJ in 2021. She had publicly stated that the Commission would examine the situation following the Noël judgment.
This is the first article in a three-part series. · Read the full investigation →
- Article 1 / 3The founding account — you are reading this article
- Article 2 / 3What hasn't changed
- Article 3 / 3The unanswered questions
Independent citizen platform — Non-governmental — The author is not a lawyer.
Ajouter un commentaire
Commentaires