FILE A COMPLAINT AGAINST A JUDGE

Bias, lack of respect, inappropriate remarks, breach of the duty of restraint — judges must comply with a code of ethics at all times. Depending on the court, your complaint is handled either by the Conseil de la magistrature du Québec or the Canadian Judicial Council, free of charge.

VERSION FRANÇAISE →

Did a judge behave inappropriately during your hearing? Did a judge fail in their duties of courtesy, impartiality or dignity? You have the right to file a complaint. Depending on who appointed the judge, two independent bodies receive complaints in Canada: the Conseil de la magistrature du Québec for provincially-appointed judges, and the Canadian Judicial Council for federally-appointed judges.

This guide shows you how to identify the right body, organize your facts, draft your complaint with the help of AI, and submit it — in four simple steps.

Grounds for complaint

When to file a complaint — the most common grounds

The vast majority of judges carry out their duties with integrity. But when this is not the case, several behaviours can justify a complaint regarding judicial ethics. The assessment is always made considering the full context.

Bias and conflict of interest

A judge who hears a case involving a relative, who displays a visible bias toward one of the parties, or who fails to recuse themselves when they should have.

Lack of respect or inappropriate remarks

Humiliating remarks, ridiculing a litigant, contemptuous or discriminatory comments, unjustified aggressiveness, condescending tone toward parties or witnesses.

Lack of diligence

Excessive delays in rendering judgment, repeated absences, manifest disinterest in the case, breach of the duty to fully dedicate oneself to judicial functions.

Breach of the duty of restraint

Inappropriate behaviour outside the courtroom, public statements about ongoing cases, active political involvement, or conduct that tarnishes the dignity of the office.

Important to know

A complaint regarding judicial ethics cannot change a judgment. If you believe the judge made a mistake in their application of the law or in their assessment of the facts, the appropriate recourse is to appeal the decision — not to file an ethics complaint. The Conseil de la magistrature is not a court of appeal.

The Council also cannot order the judge to apologize (with rare exceptions at the CJC), to pay financial compensation, or to order a new trial. It can only sanction an ethical breach — through a reprimand or, in the most serious cases, a recommendation for removal from office.

There is no maximum deadline to file a complaint, but it is recommended to do so quickly while the facts and witnesses are still accessible.

Specific rules at the CJC: the Canadian Council does not accept hyperlinks in complaints, the complaint cannot exceed 20,000 characters (about 6 pages), and no supporting documents are required at the time of filing. The CJC also does not handle complaints against retired or deceased judges.

The process

The guide in 4 simple steps

1

Identify the right body based on who appointed the judge

The first thing to do is determine which body will handle your complaint. This depends entirely on the court where the judge sits:

Conseil de la magistrature du Québec (CMQ) — for judges appointed by the Government of Quebec: Court of Quebec, Human Rights Tribunal, Professions Tribunal, municipal courts, presiding justices of the peace
Canadian Judicial Council (CJC) — for judges appointed by the federal government: Superior Court of Quebec, Quebec Court of Appeal, Federal Court, Federal Court of Appeal, Supreme Court of Canada

If in doubt, check the judgment rendered: it identifies the court. If you are unsure, both councils can redirect you.

2

Gather and organize your facts

Open a document and write a simple, factual chronological summary. Include these essential elements:

The full name of the judge and the court where they sit
Your court file number and the date of the relevant hearing
A precise description of the words, actions or attitudes complained of — with the full context
The names of witnesses present (lawyers, bailiffs, clerks, other litigants)
Useful documents: copy of the judgment, hearing transcripts if available, notes taken at the time

Important note: the Conseil de la magistrature du Québec does not request photos, videos, screenshots or identification documents. If such documents are necessary, its staff will request them from you.

3

Ask Claude to draft your complaint

Open Claude — or Gemini or ChatGPT — and paste your facts with this prompt:

"I want to draft a complaint regarding judicial ethics against Judge [Name] of [name of court], in case [number]. The complaint will be submitted to the [Conseil de la magistrature du Québec / Canadian Judicial Council]. Here are my facts: [paste your chronological summary]. Draft a factual, clear and respectful complaint. Identify the ethical duties of the judge that appear to have been violated (integrity, impartiality, courtesy, duty of restraint, diligence). The document must be professional and ready to be submitted."

The AI will draft a structured initial version that connects your facts to the ethical obligations of judges. Read carefully and verify that all facts are accurate before submitting.

Note for the CJC: the complaint must be no more than 20,000 characters (about 6 double-spaced pages) and cannot contain hyperlinks. All allegations must be described in the form's text — not in attached documents.

4

Submit your complaint to the right body

The complaint must be made in writing. Neither council handles complaints by telephone.

Conseil de la magistrature du Québec — provincial judges
Address
Quebec City Courthouse, Édifice Marc-André-Bédard, 300 boul. Jean-Lesage, suite RC.01 — Québec (Québec) G1K 8K6
Telephone
418 644-2196 · Toll-free: 1 866 463-2824
Canadian Judicial Council — federal judges
Address
Canadian Judicial Council — Ottawa (Ontario) K1A 0W8
Telephone
613 288-1566
Website

The service is entirely free, regardless of which body handles it. You will receive an acknowledgment of receipt, and the council will send a copy of your complaint to the judge concerned so they can submit their observations.

What may happen next

Possible decisions after review of your complaint

After reviewing your complaint, each council can make one of the following decisions:

Dismissal of the complaint · Corrective measures (warning, training, ordered apology) · Constitution of a board of inquiry · Reprimand · Recommendation for removal from office

At the CMQ (provincial judges): the Council's decision is final. There is no appeal mechanism for the complainant. Only an application for judicial review of legality may, exceptionally, be presented to the Superior Court.

At the CJC (federal judges): since Bill C-9 came into force on June 22, 2023, an internal appeal mechanism exists — but it belongs to the judge concerned or to the presenting counsel, not to the complainant. The process can lead to an appeal panel of the Council and, ultimately, to an application for leave to appeal before the Supreme Court of Canada.

If new facts come to light later, you can always file a new complaint.

Important limits

What AI does — and what it does not do

AI helps you organize your facts and draft a clear and respectful document. It does not give you legal advice and does not replace a legal professional.

Judicial councils frequently dismiss complaints that actually target a judicial decision rather than the conduct of a judge. Before filing a complaint, ask yourself: am I challenging the judgment (wrong decision) or the conduct (attitude, words, gestures)? To challenge a judgment, you must appeal within the prescribed deadlines.

If you are dissatisfied with the quality of services provided by the CMQ itself (delays, communication, file management — and not the result), you can contact the Québec Ombudsman. It cannot modify or overturn the Council's decisions, but it can investigate the quality of the handling.

If your situation is complex, you can consult a lawyer or, if you are eligible, obtain legal aid.

Ready to submit your complaint?

START MY COMPLAINT TO THE CMQ →
In summary

Judicial ethics exists for everyone

Judges hold considerable power over the lives of citizens. This power comes with strict ethical duties: integrity, impartiality, courtesy, restraint, equal treatment. When a judge fails in these duties, there is neither shame nor recklessness in filing a complaint — it is a mechanism provided by law, accessible to every citizen, free, and one that helps improve the quality of the judicial system. Identify the right body, organize your facts, draft your complaint with the help of AI, and submit it. The rest is up to the competent council.

An error to report? Information to add or a question about this guide? Write to us at justice-quebec@outlook.com — we read every message.